Verification Benchmarks
Every number is evidence.
The table below is not precomputed. The moment you open this page, four reference designs are recalculated in this browser by ElecHub Lab’s analytical FHA engine and ngspice transient simulation, and the differences are shown as-is.
Drone charging pad 100 W
SS · 140 kHz · air gap 25 mmRunning…Power-tool dock 60 W
SP · 110 kHz · air gap 15 mmRunning…E-scooter pad 240 W
LCC-S · 85 kHz · air gap 50 mmRunning…EV auxiliary charging 3.3 kW
Double LCC · 85 kHz · air gap 150 mmRunning…Method and limitations
- FHA analyzes the resonant tank at the fundamental component. SPICE runs a time-domain simulation of full-bridge square-wave switching, so some difference is physically expected.
- Coil ESR and compensation-network ESR are included in both models. Semiconductor switching loss and core loss are not yet included in this benchmark path.
- The rectifier is modeled in SPICE as an ideal diode bridge plus a DC filter.
- Every release should pass both the browser benchmark route and the WPT engine integration path before deployment.